Identity Governance & Administration
Solution Buyer’s Guide


Why IGA Modernization is
No Longer Optional

Over the last few years, cloud acceleration, security threats, and constant technology transformation, bombarded enterprises. More than ever, they lived the adage that ‘the only constant in life is change.’ For many, inflexible IGA technology worsened the challenges brought on by constant business shifts. Security leaders struggled to adapt, embrace cloud, and manage risk among growing identity bases.

In fact, according to a study by the Ponemon Institute, “Most identity and access (IAM) programs have not achieved maturity which is affecting organizations’ ability to reduce identity & access risks.” Only 16 percent of the 1000 IT professionals surveyed say their organizations have reached the mature stage.

What best describes the maturity of your
organization’s IAM program?

The State of Enterprise Identity, The Ponemon Institute, May 2022.

The lack of comprehensive identity controls or policies puts organizations at risk. The study found that in the past two years, 56 percent of respondents say their organizations had an average of three data breaches or other access-related security incidents in the past two years. Fifty-two percent of these respondents say the breach was due to a lack of comprehensive identity controls or policies.

IGA is fundamental to modern enterprise security. Properly deployed, it regulates access to data and business transactions for human and machine identities. Importantly, IGA builds a foundation for Zero Trust across cloud, hybrid, and on-prem environments.

Below, we highlight key macro trends facing global enterprises. As you review each, ask yourself, “Does my current solution offer the agility, scalability, and security benefits my enterprise now needs?

Accelerating Cloud Adoption

Every day, more apps and workloads move to the cloud. Workforces operate beyond the confines of corporate offices, and converging IT and operational technology (OT) expand the threat landscape. As these dynamics play out, legacy systems flounder.

Legacy systems limit visibility and rely on manual upkeep and custom coding. Further, SaaS proliferation makes enforcing identity policies (and identifying risky users) more difficult. Additionally, while leaders push the cloud for agility and productivity, maintaining security in the midst of rapid digital services adoption stretches IGA processes.

“The shift to cloud-based IGA is accelerating, with many smaller organizations insisting on SaaS-only solutions. Gartner sees this direction moving into the larger organizations that are typically assessing the feasibility of IGA offerings based in the cloud or looking at cloud-first if possible.”

Liking this eBook? Save it for later

Growing Identity Complexity

‘Identity’ once meant human users within an organization’s walls. Today, the term represents a host of entities including bots, APIs, workloads, vendors, contract workers, customers, and partners.

If an entity can be discretely identified – and has a consistent set of attributes, it needs securing. Constant digital transformation campaigns spawn legions of these new machine identities and widen attack surfaces. Meanwhile, poor access management and visibility multiply risks. Just 40% of CISOs and IT leaders say they have an enterprise-wide strategy to manage machine identities.

Rising Cyberthreats

The evolution of cyberattacks and growing use of cloud workloads and applications creates a “perfect storm” for IT leaders, suggests Gartner. According to one estimate, cybercrime will cost companies an estimated $10.5 trillion annually by 2025.

Complications from introducing new technologies including IoT, open-source code, digital supply chains, and cloud applications increase threats. Companies must progress agile identity management, visibility, and monitoring–in particular, to limit compromise connected to application adoption, user permissions, system configuration, and new workloads.

Evolving Regulatory Landscape

At both state and national levels, lawmakers are pushing ambitious security legislation. As we’ve predicted, non-compliance issues worsen as companies sort through revisions and try to harden a variety of processes – from HR onboarding to customer offboarding – that touch data protected by various rules.

Companies need systems to enable least privilege and privacy by design, while focusing on pathways to simplify audit compliance, address consent management, and an individual’s right to erasure, for example.

These trends increase decision-making complications for security leaders. However, they may also provide the impetus enterprises need to introduce modernization.

So what does a flexible IGA solution look like? Our guide explores this question.

Read on as we outline key features and capabilities, and share an insider view of must-ask platform evaluation questions.

What Defines a Modern Cloud IGA Platform?

According to a recent Forrester Report, “In replacing their manual identity management environments, organizations seek a flexible, comprehensive solution to improve workflows, eliminate compliance risk, and adapt to future IT trends.”

Key Characteristic #1
Born in the Cloud

A modern IGA solution should be cloud-native, full stop. This architecture is essential to reduce infrastructure spending and management complexity, and to realize the cost savings and flexibility of SaaS.

In a cloud-first paradigm, your IGA solution can grow and scale as the business changes. Through auto-scaling, for example, companies embrace real-time scale and can lower ongoing expenses. This approach also eliminates the guesswork from downstream hardware investments.

“With accelerated cloud adoption, digitization, and the need for constant, anywhere access, the number one capability your organization requires is the ability to scale. The number of digital identities—and their complexity—is only going to grow in the future.”

– Paul Mezzera, VP of Strategy, Saviynt

Companies should also consider total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) factors. Legacy IGA solutions stick enterprises with hardware purchasing, ongoing maintenance expenses, and complex — potentially impossible — upgrades. The standard data center approach brings with it a constant loop of replacing old systems and supporting backup hardware to swap out when old systems fail. The cloud paradigm eliminates the upgrade cycle trap.

Key Characteristic #2
Emphasizes Adaptability

The modern IGA solution should be configurable rather than static, monolithic, or needing extensive customization. Solutions must be able to adapt to unknowns, including changes in adjacent technologies and IGA processes. For example, when a cloud provider releases a new product, IGA solutions will be able to integrate with it more quickly – improving application onboarding and governance.

Today, IGA (and related IAM capabilities) must account for new identity concepts like machine-based identities including service accounts, robotic process automation (RPA), or internet of things (IoT) devices.

Key Characteristic #3
Accelerates Automation

Legacy solution inefficiencies increase costs and introduce risks. One common issue is manual access provisioning and deprovisioning. Another includes manual separation of duties (SoD) management where overburdened security staff can overlook toxic permission combinations.

According to Mezzera, the explosion of identity types, and application access makes determining appropriate access levels convoluted. “It’s impossible to manually review now – we need analytics coupled with machine learning to stay safe.”

Automation makes IGA solutions faster and more efficient – and adds incremental business value. “Why waste time researching permissions and searching for toxic combinations? Focus instead on real, revenue-driving processes,” shares Mezzera.

One of the most powerful automation use-cases surrounds intelligent approvals and access reviews. Instead of manually combing through dozens – or even hundreds – of access requests, modern platforms enable smart review and filtering. This means: automation of low-risk/no risk access approvals to remove friction, boost productivity, and lower risks.

Key Characteristic #4
Converges Technologies & Functionality

Modern IGA solutions must be able to ingest information from key security and GRC platforms including PAM, SIEM, UEBA, and vulnerability management tools. By utilizing data from other security technologies, enterprises improve security posture and improve TCO/ROI. For instance, by converging all risk signals in a single dashboard, IT departments reduce risk-monitoring fatigue and decrease operating costs.

Significantly, modern platforms also converge core technologies like PAM and IGA. In cloud-first business, the distinction between privileged and non-privileged users gets blurred. Traditional PAM solutions can’t handle the transient nature of the cloud as workloads are spun up and down within hours, or as admins perform privileged activities (via direct console access, RDP, command line) and introduce new access points.

Capability convergence means that enterprises can provide the “right level” of access to new and existing users. No longer is privileged access only an IT problem – meaningful governance controls, policies, and reviews reduce management silos and bring this back into the business.

“A converged identity platform helps make organizations more secure, compliant with regulations and provides a faster return on investment.”

Security Magazine, Will the convergence of IGA, PAM and AM fix the fractured identity landscape?

The Big 5: Questions to Ask When Choosing an IGA Solution

According to the Gartner Buyer’s Guide for IGA, “…the majority of IGA projects start as a result of a production issue, like an audit finding or a data breach, and buying initiatives follow a firefighting pattern, often skipping ideal planning steps.”

Ideally, enterprises start before an emergency arises; this requires proactive planning and internal championing. To support the procurement journey and help leaders secure platforms that meet business and security KPIs, we’ve put together five questions to ask when evaluating IGA options.

How Does the IGA Platform Fit Into My Risk Reduction Strategy?

Why It Matters

Managing the digital workforce across modern ecosystems requires better identity governance and administration. Because identity is a favorite attack vector for bad actors, IGA is crucial to risk reduction.

Most organizations have some Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) program relying on patchwork technologies to reduce risk. These range from multi-factor authentication (MFA) to user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA), and security information and event management (SIEM). IGA supports deeper risk reduction; in particular, because modern solutions extract data from other tools for more holistic security.

Many identity platforms promise, but don’t deliver, lower risk profiles, improved decision making, reduced compliance violations, and Zero Trust. But the right IGA platform is central to coordinated risk reduction and provides a framework for ongoing security effectiveness.

What To Look For
A robust IGA solution applies the following techniques to reduce risks:

Risk-Based Approach – To address “excessive access” risk, use an identity platform that incorporates risk-based decision-making to determine user privilege levels. This helps simplify compliance and reduces labor costs. For risk-based decision making, modern tools can also leverage data from disparate security systems to set risk thresholds and remediate risky behaviors.

Lifecycle Management – Both human and machine identities need proper management when joining, moving, or leaving an environment. Rationalizing these identities also allows access consistency across the IT ecosystem. To do this effectively, IT leaders need to be able to directly link accounts to identities within a single, centralized repository. This allows automated provisioning and deprovisioning, ensuring that credentials never end up orphaned.

Just-in-Time (JIT) Provisioning and “No Standing Privilege” – To support Zero Trust (or least privilege), solutions must continuously verify user access during a session. Traditional password-based “one and done” systems that require credentials once to permit access put enterprises at risk.

Solutions that employ least privilege ensure users only receive the minimum access required to perform their job.

Automated Access Review Processes – Manual access reviews often lead to issues of orphaned accounts and excess access. These reviews are often time-consuming and error-prone: When faced with hundreds or thousands of users and accounts, managers may be tempted to select Approve All. A risk-based system automates this; escalating high-risk situations for manual review.

Analytics and Continuous Compliance – An identity platform employing data-rich analytics surfaces the right metrics to quantify organizational risks. It also proves whether your security program moves the needle with respect to monitoring, managing, and reducing these risks. Do not underestimate this with respect to securing executive program buy-in.

With built-in AI and machine learning, enterprises enable continuous compliance monitoring, documentation, and access violation remediation from day one. Alongside this, to enhance risk monitoring, context, visibility, and remediation, look for a solution that integrates with adjacent security tools like ZTNA, XDR, SIEM, and UEBA platforms.

What Business Needs Must Be Considered in the IGA Evaluation?

Why It Matters

IGA modernization crossects multiple stakeholder interests. Thus, it is important to understand business needs before choosing a solution.

Generally, transformation projects change users’ workflows; make sure to anticipate wholesale process or experience breakages. Once you map these, create your “business case” – that is, plan how to evangelize modernization and present how changes free staff to do meaningful work, not just “identity-like” tasks.

The right solution brings efficiencies that lower total cost of ownership (TCO), strengthen your security posture, and improve stakeholders’ contributions. So begin with the business in mind. Not only will you deploy a better platform, but you’ll have champions behind your deployment.

What To Look For
Before selecting an IGA solution, establish a full understanding of business goals, applications, and workflows. Start this process by interviewing impacted stakeholders. As you receive feedback, validate findings against vendors’ solutions: